🔗 Share this article

Ouch. From one perspective, Australia's protracted bid to host the Cop31 next year has concluded unsuccessfully.

It campaigned for over 36 months for the rights to host the largest global environmental conference and green trade fair, which would have brought tens of thousands of people to the South Australian capital next November.

This won't occur. Rather, the conference known as Cop31 is moving to the resort city of Antalya, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey.

Disappointment and Conflicting Signals

The result will be a significant disappointment to numerous individuals who had believed organizing the environmental gathering could help accelerate the country's transition from being a carbon-based economy to a renewable energy superpower, and bring international focus to the survival crisis facing island countries in the Pacific, who would have been co-hosts.

The process that led to failure has been an unclear situation. In recent days, there have been questions that the prime minister and other senior figures really wanted the bid to succeed. His statements were ambiguous at best. It translated to stories in the Australian and international media saying the government was withdrawing.

This differed from the message being relayed at the climate negotiations in the Brazilian city, where the environment minister, Chris Bowen, had just stated the country was "fully committed to success".

Ambiguous backing is not a new issue for the hosting proposal. Although Bowen championed it, other senior members of the administration have only occasionally appeared to be interested.

DFAT, usually in charge for international climate negotiations, has been disengaged and sometimes outright opposed.

Evidence suggests the prime minister has considered UN climate conferences a important focus. He hasn't attended one since becoming prime minister in 2022. We'll never know, but many may question if additional efforts were possible to get the bid over the line.

A Different Perspective

That's one interpretation. But there is another way to consider it.

In the context the Cop30 talks this week in Brazil – and from an global viewpoint – the decision on Wednesday night may, ironically, have been the most favorable outcome possible.

Bowen set out on that day an novel agreement that he was working on with his colleague from Turkey, the Turkish minister. The Turkish government would be the conference leader, organizer and primary coordinator, and Australia – Bowen himself – would assume a role as "chief negotiator", wrangling almost all nations on the matters that the nations actually turn up for – the talks on how to together combat the environmental emergency.

Additionally, there would be a greater focus on the Pacific region, including a preliminary meeting on an island nation.

Grounds for Scepticism

There are plenty of grounds for doubt. Turkey and Australia do not have a strong partnership. Specific aspects of the agreement had not been completed at the time of writing. The entire arrangement could collapse before it begins.

However, it might represent a way to recover value from what looked like an approaching car crash for the multilateral work on global warming.

The Turkish government is widely seen in the global community as having been determined on causing havoc in the international climate negotiations. The system is supposed to work by unanimous agreement. Typically, that means if there are several nations in the race those with less support either bow out voluntarily, or a deal is quietly done to encourage them to step aside.

Turkey clearly had weaker endorsement than Australia and Pacific islands to organize the summit. At least 24 of the 28 countries responsible for selecting next year's host had backed the southern pitch.

However, uniquely, Turkey declined to withdraw. The term "bastardry" has been thrown around in recent days, and not only by Australians.

International Dynamics

Ankara's stubbornness can be interpreted as a manifestation of the fracturing geopolitical climate. With the US absent under the former president, there has been no dominant nation with the influence to confront the oil producers that offered the Turks with some cover.

The Turkish president is seen as aligned with Vladimir Putin. Some countries feared a summit obstructed from the top if his administration led the discussions. And the Germans did not want to have to host an underprepared climate conference at the UN climate headquarters in the German city, which is what would have occurred under UN rules if the deadlock wasn't broken.

An Innovative Approach

A resolution was needed. International frameworks is flawed and often unsettling to observe, but global cooperation has demonstrably had an impact in the fight against global heating. This joint approach is a creative idea that keeps that going when it is needed more than ever.

Despite understandable criticism of the Australian government over its contradictory stance for increasing carbon-based exports, climate activists who participate in international meetings see the minister as a force for good in the talks. He has been requested to lead discussion groups at each of the four conferences he has attended.

This matters. While some have dismissed the role of a "president of negotiations", specialists from academic institutions and veteran observers at environmental negotiations assert it is pivotal to their success.

"Every successful Cop has been determined by a leader directing proceedings who can understand, forge agreement and deliver an significant result. We saw that in the German capital in 1995, in the Mexican resort in 2010 and Paris in 2015. The reverse happened in Copenhagen in 2009," he says. "This position is critical at the conference other than making sure that delegates are fed."

Remaining Concerns

Multiple unanswered questions. For example, civil society is essential at climate conferences. What, if at all, can the federal administration do to stop a restriction on civil society by the host government?

Perhaps not much. But that doesn't stop this deal appearing as the most promising opportunity available to have a summit that may provide benefits for the Pacific, Australia and the global community. It's worth a try.